25 Comments
User's avatar
Clayton Eskew's avatar

Does it really matter who hacked it as long as the info in the dossier was accurate and not altered in any way? What separates you from the others is that you possess a spine and a healthy dose of integrity. Quite the shit storm Mr. K. Did you have any inkling is was going to blow up like this?

Expand full comment
Ken Klippenstein's avatar

Yes, I knew it would be a huge meltdown lol

Expand full comment
Susan Becraft's avatar

Let me get this straight. According to the establishment, election interference by Russia, China and Iran is verboten. Israel via AIPAC, OTOH, owns most of the establishment and even boasts when one of their anointed candidates wins. AIPAC spent millions on at least two House races, and the establishment didn’t bat an eye. And, of course, the United States would never interfere with a foreign election. (Read sarcasm.)

Censoring you for publishing the dossier tells me yet again that the establishment thinks I’m incapable of drawing my own conclusions. On one hand, they bleat, “We need educated voters”; on the other, they forbid me from educating myself.

My brain is tired from processing too many ironies.

Keep up the good work, Ken. We need you.

Expand full comment
Alex's avatar

Censorship is alive and well in the West.

It's done by corporations most often.

Expand full comment
Ken Klippenstein's avatar

Yep.

Expand full comment
StanleyTwoBrix's avatar

Wonder if this will have some kind of Streisand Effect, which would be very amusing.

Expand full comment
Ken Klippenstein's avatar

I think we’re seeing it now!

Expand full comment
Denise O'Leary-Siemer's avatar

What is Streisand Effect?

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar
Sep 29Edited

"The Streisand effect is an unintended consequence of attempts to hide, remove, or censor information, where the effort instead increases public awareness of the information. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

Expand full comment
Paulo de Sousa's avatar

Interestingly enough, they seem to have been less than thorough in their hysterical response, because I’ve just shared it on WhatsApp and Messenger, both of which are owned by Zuckerberg… Maybe EU regulations won’t allow them to issue those app-wide bans or something?? 🤔

Expand full comment
Ken Klippenstein's avatar

Interesting, I hadn’t even thought about WhatsApp. Insane how much meta owns

Expand full comment
Paulo de Sousa's avatar

Yeah, it’s insane, talk about monopoly!! It’s the only reason why I had to concede and just suspend my FB account: Had I cancelled it (like I wanted to), I’d lose access to all Meta platforms, Messenger and WhatsApp included, and those are how I keep in touch with my friends’n’shit, so… 😐

Expand full comment
Denise O'Leary-Siemer's avatar

Ken, you're a hero! I'm REALLY looking forward to reading the dossier now! Stay strong and watch your backside.

Expand full comment
Sonya Sukalski's avatar

Funny how we're worried about Iran's influence, but AIPAC's hundreds of millions of dollars are not a problem.

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

"I think we learned our lesson, certainly as META is concerned"

Clearly not.

Expand full comment
Laurie Underwood's avatar

Well hell. I've been without electricity, and my internet has been spotty, since Helene blew through. I have a lot of reading to catch up on - but I guess the dossier won't be a part of the catch up.

Expand full comment
Ken Klippenstein's avatar

Substack hasn't taken it down god bless em! The dossier is embedded in my story here: https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/read-the-jd-vance-dossier

Expand full comment
Laurie Underwood's avatar

Glad to hear it. Thanks Ken!

Expand full comment
Boris Petrov's avatar

There are repeated statements that Iran hacked Vance’s dossier.

What are indications that that may be correct????

Obviously in current bipartisan pro war hysteria against Iran even assassination attempts on Trump were tried to be connected with Iran; obviously Vance dossier was likely prepared by DNC-CIA cabal in their continuous 8 year long war against Trump….

Once again, could you detail from where come the insinuations that Iran is involved instead of DNC-financed opposition research???

Expand full comment
Debbie Lerman's avatar

It's baffling that you would accept the Iran hacking story as probably true, given what we know about the Russia hacking story and all the other fake foreign influence stories used to suppress documents/information the establishment does not want us to see, that are clearly of little to zero interest to foreign powers. The idea that Russia or Iran cares about a Hunter Biden laptop or a JD Vance vetting document seems laughable to me. In contrast, the idea that our leaders use the ruse of "foreign influence" to censor and control the narrative makes a whole lot of sense.

Expand full comment
John Reynolds's avatar

Yea but they were complicit spreading the beheaded raped fake facts started by our friends you-know-whio, screams while BSing

Expand full comment
Billy Masterson's avatar

FakeBawk wouldn't publish the link to dossier as a link. They published an easily readable IMAGE of the link though, so...

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/read-the-jd-vance-dossier

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 29Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ken Klippenstein's avatar

"Don't be evil" appears to have been amended by two letters

Expand full comment
Rachel Baldes's avatar

They don't use that anymore, it's been a while and it's been borne out that they are very serious about it NOT being used to describe them. Ugh.

Expand full comment
Chad's avatar

They only ever said that to help establish themselves against Microsoft. Once that task was done, the empty slogan predictably disappeared.

Expand full comment